Experiential Learning

Community Health Placement (learning about wellness) in clinical practicums

Developed by: 
School of Physiotherapy
Institution: 
The University of Sydney
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

The Community Health Practicum is a 5 week practicum in which the student explores areas of health need that have not been traditionally covered in physiotherapy programs, such as mental health, aged care, health promotion, sports coverage, obesity prevention and management. These areas reflect the changing health care needs of the Australian population and will ensure that graduates are well positioned to provide appropriate care in the changing health climate. For example, one community health practicum might involve 3 days per week in a nursing home and weekends covering weekend sports, such as school football or local netball teams.
This practicum offers less formal structure and greater diversity than traditional practicums and this will enable students to gain the generic skills of flexibility, time management and adapting to changing health care needs.
 
Students are required to generate independent learning contracts specific to the practicum. These learning contracts are developed and negotiated with practicum mentors. Students and practicum mentors work collaboratively to develop strategies to ensure attainment of the learning contract. In addition to assessment of physiotherapy clinical skills, students are required to reflect on the diversity of the practicum and provide evidence of the learning process.

Course Name: 
Bachelor Physiotherapy
Year Level: 
Third Year
Expected Outcomes: 

The students will be required to satisfy the unit of study learning outcomes that include physiotherapy specific objectives and generic objectives related to development of learning contract

  • Assesses the patients' abilities, problems and needs
  • Interprets and analyses assessment findings for the diagnosis of the patients' problems and the definition of patients' needs
  • Develops a physiotherapy intervention plan to meet defined goals
  • Implements physiotherapy intervention involving - manual skills and therapeutic equipment
  • Implements physiotherapy intervention involving - training and teaching
  • Evaluates the effectiveness of physiotherapy intervention and modifies accordingly
  • Communicates effectively and appropriately
  • Demonstrates professional behaviour appropriate to physiotherapy
  • Operates effectively within the healthcare system
  • Ensures safety of patient, staff and self at all times
  • Develop a learning contract relevant to the placement that is mutually negotiated with the clinical mentor.
  • Outline the strategies and resources that will help meet these learning needs.
  • Identify potential evidence of successful completion of learning objectives.
  • Critically review the process and outcomes of the learning contract.
Effective Aspects: 
  • provision of health care to match the community needs in a variety of settings
  • development of an independent learning contract
  • taking responsibility for attainment of the learning contract, including time management, communication with mentor.
  • Collection and presentation of evidence of reflection on learning process.
Evaluation: 

The community health practicum in the current program runs as Community Fieldwork. This unit of study has been evaluated by the three different stakeholders involved in the operation of the unit. The stakeholders include the students, the academic advisors and the fieldwork mentors. Students were asked to complete the university's Unit of Study Evaluation (U.S.E) form. The remaining stakeholders were asked to complete a survey specifically designed for evaluation of the unit.

Evaluation Outcomes: 

Students - initially students reported difficulty drawing up their own learning objectives and undertaking completion of the objectives. However, the vast majority of students reported that once they were on placement they enjoyed the opportunity to work in their chosen area and learned a great deal from the placement and the experience.
Academic Advisors - Most academic advisors were positive about the unit of study.
 
Fieldwork Mentors - The vast majority of mentors indicated that they were highly satisfied with the objectives and implementation of the unit; the students' professionalism and performance; and the opportunity to assist student's learning in non-traditional health/community settings.

Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

This is the last year that Community Fieldwork will be offered because the undergraduate curriculum is changing. Most aspects of the Community Fieldwork placement will be incorporated into the Community Health practicum, which is offered for the first time in 2006.

The placement will be extended from 2006, and it will more specifically target health care needs of Australians, and the contribution that physiotherapy can make.
 

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
K. Refshauge
Contact Faculty/School: 
School of Physiotherapy
Contact Institution: 
The University of Sydney

Project U, a unique undergraduate research training initiative

Developed by: 
Associate Professors Marie Williams and Karen Grimmer
Institution: 
University of South Australia
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

Our teaching approaches include lectures, small group learning and problem solving, ownership of outcomes, practical skill development and participation in assessment. We teach our students that research has many different approaches and that there is value in all of them. We also show students that statistics are tools to assist in summarising and understanding data, an approach that has particularly assisted in breaking down barriers to reading the research literature. We embed different methods of teaching into our research training model to ensure that students attain as many graduate qualities as possible.
Practical research activities include collecting data from children on school premises. Six measurement stations are used and the students then participate in data amalgamation at the end of data collection. The first station is the questionnaire station, which includes assigning appropriate (pre-set) ID numbers to participants, reconfirming their previously written informed consent on the day of testing, refamiliarising them with the study process and checking that questionnaires have been appropriate completed. The other stations collect data related to the child's assigned ID number, on anthropometric data, school backpack contents, weight and design, child's balance and coordination, child's muscle performance (strength and endurance), hypermobility and standing posture.
 
Data handling and analysis is also taught. Each student learns to record data appropriately on child identity, and to enter this data accurately using MS Excel. Validation techniques are taught, whereby students check their data entry for accuracy before presenting it to senior research staff for inclusion in the overall dataset.
 
Students work in small groups for all activities, which teaches them team management skills. They work together to set their research questions based on required data items, and with the assistance of senior research and teaching staff, identify the research design and statistical analysis required to answer the research question. They all have a responsibility to contribute to the final research report, in the manner expected of professional research groups (i.e. taking ownership of each step in producing the research report) (ref JAMA conditions for authorship)
 

Course Name: 
Research Project U is a 4th year course in the Bachelor of Physiotherapy where the emphasis is on providing students with knowledge about research methodology but also providing students with active involvement in data collection. The overall aims of the course is to provide students with the opportunity to be actively involved in a major research project. By doing so, students developed group skills in compiling, critically reviewing and analyzing information (both data and scientific concepts) and written and verbal, particularly scientific communication skills.
Year Level: 
Fourth Year
Expected Outcomes: 

This program gives undergraduate students a hands-on experience of research endeavors, as they join an existing research project with well developed structures and processes. Whilst they do not have responsibility for research design or overall organization, they are integrally responsible for the year-to-year running of the project. This gives them a sense of ownership over research activities and outcomes for their particular year group. Student outcomes are learning about measurement issues (including data recording, reliability and error), learning to work in small groups, setting research questions on a specified set of data, identifying the appropriate statistics to answer the research question, and writing up the findings in a research report which could be submitted to a peer reviewed journal .

Effective Aspects: 

This project collects data from primary school and high school students. It commenced as a cross-sectional study in 1998, in which data on approximately 1300 students was collected from 12 Adelaide high schools. Since 1999, it has been a longitudinal study, in which the same information is collected from the same students each year throughout their school life. The high school study finished in 2003, when the cohort of students completed their hight schooling. The primary school project is ongoing.
The project:

  • incorporates learning activities that assist each student to ask questions, plan methods of testing questions and locate, access and interpret information to assist in sustaining or refuting supporting arguments (logical, critical and creative thinking, acquisition and development of skills in information literacy for lifelong learning)
  • provides a professional and authentic work environment where both individual and group performance such as peer evaluation are necessary and valued (working both collaboratively and autonomously, communicating effectively)
  • offers assessment activities relevant to the graduate working environment-for example, scientific writing for professional publications, data management, participation in meetings-as well as highlighting key issues within research practice (effective communication, problem solving, logical and critical thinking, ethical practice)
Evaluation: 

Internal evaluation is by student feedback (using CEI and SET instruments), focus groups and individual written responses. Students evaluate the effectiveness of their small groups as part of the course evaluation process (worth 15% total marks), and employer feedback is sought by questionnaire.
 
External evaluation is made by consulting industry partners on their perceptions of the success of the project, for instance the Dept of Education and Children's Services (the overarching body) and each of the five schools in which data collection takes place. We invite parents of children to attend test days in the schools, and we receive feedback from them regarding their perceptions of the value of the project, and the interaction of our students with the school students.

Evaluation Outcomes: 

Based on feedback from employers of our graduates over the last few years, we are pleased that our research training efforts appear to be producing young health professionals who are comfortable undertaking research activities within a department/practice, and who can lead by example. Over the past five years the general common responses include:

  • About 90% of students agreed or strongly agreed that "The subject, to date, has clarified and broadened my understanding of research processes"
  • 74% of students agreed or strongly agreed that "I feel I have a strong grasp of the need for reliability testing procedures"
  • 84% agreed or strongly agreed that "I have a good understanding of how much work is required in designing accurate and effective research protocols"
  • 78% agreed or strongly agreed that "Prior to this subject I did not know how to use computer spreadsheets such as EXCEL".

Common written comments submitted by students undertaking this course over the past five years include: " a good introduction to research...working in a group with other groups...enjoyable...insight into research...lots of practical skills... can actually see research in action-will make reading research articles a little less dreary...learning team work...dedication of staff members ...learning how to manage a project."

Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

This project has been running since 1998. Each year small refinements are made to the way the project is introduced to students, and in the ways that they are trained in the requisite research techniques, based on student and peer feedback, and on project director and course coordinator's increasing skills in presenting the research training material, and organising the data collection processes. Changes include presenting the commercial and academic outputs of the project to each year group of student researchers to give them a bigger picture of the research outputs, giving them more time to practice computer skills, providing mentoring to small groups whilst setting their research question and determining the statistical tests that underpin it.
 
After 7 year, with completion of the high school data and a potential of 4 further years of data collection in the primary school, it was considered the ideal time to consider the future the course conducted in this way. Decisions need to be made about whether the same study could be conducted in other schools or whether specific aspects could be further investigated or whether a further large study along similar lines but addressing entirely different questions could be sought. The question was also raised about whether students could achieve the same objectives using an on-line format of delivery.

We will continue to refine the teaching and mentoring aspects of this project, in line with best practice teaching and learning activities, and based on student feedback. .
In 2004 Semester 1 the students collected data at Magill Primary School in accordance with the outline presented here. In 2004 Semester 2 there will a trial of delivering the course online in its entirety. The aims, objectives and assessment of the course will remain the same with emphasis on the group experience, accessing information, data entry and analysis skills and the writing of a scientific report. Student will form themselves into groups and separate online discussion areas will be made available for each group.
Data previously collected will be made available for completing the scientific report. Course co-ordinator and other support will also be incorporated. An evaluation form has been designed and will be completed by all students and the responses to the Semester 1 and 2 formats of delivery will be compared. Where responses between students in the two semesters differ markedly or seem contentious or ambiguous, further discussion, is planned in a focus group format to explore these issues further.

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
Maureen McEvoy and Associate Professor Karen Grimmer
Contact Faculty/School: 
School of Health Sciences
Contact Institution: 
University of South Australia

Teaching and learning in Paediatrics

Developed by: 
Developed by the Staff curriculum group led by Assoc. Prof. Y. Burns, since continued/ promoted by Dr P Watter
Institution: 
The University of Queensland
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

In year 1 of the Undergraduate course and the first summer semester of the Graduate Entry Course, students are introduced to information about normal development in children. In addition to lecture format supported by slide presentations to demonstrate reactions and stages described, students participate (in groups) in practical classes to which (1)babies (0-18months) and (2) children aged 2-5 years are invited. As the children play with each other and the equipment provided, the tutor is able to demonstrate in real time the range of reactions appropriate for each child's age. Students can interact with the children if they are approached and also gain an appreciation of the social and behavioral aspects of development.
Students can then choose to seek a placement in a Paediatric context when completing their Preclinical Professional Practice commitment throughout their program. This supports the "lifespan" context in which Paediatrics is taught in stages across the programs. The whole approach is further developed during later courses in the undergraduate and GEMS programs when video footage of specific cases is used as stimulus material for group discussion and presentation, which prepares the students for their clinical practice.
 
To complete the cycle of experience, in the Physiotherapy Motor Clinics placement during final year, as well as assessing and treating children with a range of Paediatric conditions, students also attend a local kindergarten where they complete specific observational tasks on normal children to provide them with an enhanced knowledge base of "normal skill and development" against which they can compare their clients. We feel that this sequence of experiences allows students to gradually and with increasing complexity build their understanding of how children develop and the range of skills they may demonstrate at different ages, providing a baseline for comparison of clinical clients.

Course Name: 
The initial children's visits occur in PHTY1110 and PHTY7800. Follow up case based information is provided in PHTY2230/7823 and PHTY3130/7823 for Undergraduate and GEMS students respectively. (Undergraduate Courses: PHTY1110; PHTY2230; PHTY3130. GEMS Courses: PHTY7800; PHTY7823)
Year Level: 
First Year
Expected Outcomes: 

Year Level : (Initially year 1, then again for the later courses in years 2 and 3 of the undergraduate program .Initially Summer Semester and then Semester 2 in the GEMS program)
 
We expect that students will gain insight into, and knowledge of children's development, and that the manner of its presentation will engender enthusiasm for the core material and introduce many of them to a group in the community to which they may have little exposure.
 

Effective Aspects: 
  • Presented in a smaller group than the whole class so participation is more easily promoted
  • Re-presents information in another format from the lecture content so may be more effective for some learners depending on their own preferred style
  • Experienced staff are able to model behavior management appropriate to each child and management strategies useful in paediatric clinical practice.
Evaluation: 

It is routinely evaluated as part of the Course Evaluations for the courses involved, but not necessarily as a specific strategy.

Evaluation Outcomes: 

Informally, students comment favorably on the impact this class has on their interest in the area and their learning in this area.

Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

We have considered using videotape instead of these classes, but the "real life" aspect is so rewarding that we have retained it despite it being difficult to provide.

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
Dr Pauline Watter
Contact Faculty/School: 
Division of Physiotherapy, School Health and Rehabilitation Sciences
Contact Institution: 
The University of Queensland

Indigenous issues for health practitioners

Developed by: 
n/a
Institution: 
Griffith University
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

n/a

Course Name: 
n/a
Year Level: 
First Year
Expected Outcomes: 

n/a

Effective Aspects: 

n/a

Evaluation: 

n/a

Evaluation Outcomes: 

n/a

Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

n/a

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
n/a
Contact Institution: 
Griffith University

Students share meal while blindfolded to raise awareness of disability

Developed by: 
Mara Bennett
Institution: 
Griffith University
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

The blind dinner is hosted in the first physiotherapy subject: An introduction to physiotherapy.The goal of the evening is to expose the students to a short experience of what it means to be visually impaired. The use of a social setting is ideal as the consequences of the loss of sight are played out in making new acquaintances, partaking in a round table discussion, manipulating utensils, organising drinks and attempting to feed oneself in a socially appropriate way.
A guest speaker with a visual impairment who is also a fellow student of Griffith University talks to the group about his/her experience of studying and getting around campus and how everyday difficulties are negotiated.
 
The evening ends with a debriefing session by the manager of student equity services at Griffith University to give the students an opportunity to express what they have noticed and learnt form the exercise and to answer any questions they may have.

Course Name: 
The blind dinner is hosted in the first physiotherapy subject: An introduction to physiotherapy.
Year Level: 
First Year
Expected Outcomes: 

Year Level : (For the double degree students it is the beginning of their third year of a five year program of study, and for the Graduate Entry Masters students it is at the beginning of the first semester of a four semester program of study.)
 
It is expected that the students will have a greater understanding of what it means to be visually impaired in a social setting and as a student on campus. This knowledge will facilitate empathy in future experiences with people with a visual impairment.
 

Effective Aspects: 

Experiential learning is lifelong learning. Some of the students find the exercise challenging and all the students make discoveries that are new to them.

Evaluation: 

Short answer questionnaire was given to the students on the next day.

Evaluation Outcomes: 

Students reported that the evening was a positive learning experience with new discoveries and a greater understanding of the world of the person with a visual impairment. Information discussed by the guest speaker informed the students on correct protocol on addressing and communicating with a person with a visual impairment and the assumptions that must not be made by a sighted person.

Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

No

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
Norm Morris
Contact Faculty/School: 
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
Contact Institution: 
Griffith University