Professional issues

Using role play to assess and enhance the integration of learning

Developed by: 
Robyn Cupit
Institution: 
The University of Queensland
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

Assessment is known to drive learning, so for learning objectives to be met, assessment must reflect those objectives to allow students to demonstrate the nature of their learning. (Gibbs 1995). Where integration of various aspects of learning is important, a challenge exists to find ways of teaching and assessing which provide opportunity for that integration to occur and its importance and relevance to be appreciated. A further challenge is to find a way of assessing students, which is in itself a continuation of learning and an enjoyable experience. A possible solution can be found in the concept of "performance" in the form of role-play.
Students in year one undertake a course with major themes in 'communication', 'understanding disability' and 'developing professionalism'. It is anticipated that by the end of the course students will have acquired both knowledge and skills. To test the integration of knowledge and skill and the ability to actually apply them in a real world situation, students are organized into self -selected groups of six students and required to develop a role -play response to a given scenario. In the role play, the dialogue and actions are to be used to illustrate the group's awareness and acknowledgement of human / patient rights, their understanding of communication skills and their ability to make caring attitudes explicit to a patient. A short summary report is prepared and presented to clarify which elements of the play represent fulfillment of these objectives. The play and the verbal presentation are part of the assessed exercise, which includes a two- minute question time. Total time for the presentation is 12 minutes. Students receive this information by handout, which also includes information on the assessment criteria. A copy is posted to the Web CT.
 
Groups are given their scenario once all students are allocated. The scenarios are developed by the teaching staff and raise a range of issues that require attention to patient rights, good communication skills, professional conduct and sensitivity and compassion in patient or client management. Individual mark sheets for each scenario are prepared, reflecting the expectation of the issues to be raised.
Students allocate the workload and responsibilities within their group and are required to sign an acceptance of the shared mark based on equity of load carried. The group scenario presentation has an assessment weight of 15%.
 
Question time allows both the students and the examiners, who have taught in the course, an opportunity to clarify issues or to extend the learning of the group around issues that arise from the handling of the scenario.
There has been strong group cooperation and commitment to the exercise. There is strong evidence of integration of the learning and skill development as well as strong indication by the use of humor (and cross dressing !), that student learning has been an enjoyable experience in modules of a course that are heavily focused in small group discussion and peer supported learning.
 

Course Name: 
PHTY 1110 The Physiotherapy Profession and Basic Processes A - Block One
Year Level: 
First Year
Expected Outcomes: 
  • Demonstrated awareness and acknowledgement of human / patient rights
  • Demonstrated understanding of communication skills
  • Demonstrated ability to use effectively, a range of communication skills
  • Demonstrated understanding of the nature of caring and the development of a therapeutic relationship
  • Demonstrated ability to make caring attitudes explicit to a patient.
  • Demonstrated ability to work cooperatively in a team
Effective Aspects: 

It requires the student to integrate knowledge from several areas of the coursework and demonstrate its relevant and immediate application to the practice of physiotherapy.

Evaluation: 
  • Through course evaluations which enquire about the relevance of the assessment
  • By evaluation of the ability of students to meet the learning objectives.
  • By the ability of students to use the methodology successfully on further occasions within the coursework
Evaluation Outcomes: 

The assessment was deemed by students to be relevant and enjoyable.
Standards have been consistently high over a four-year period.
 
Students entering year three show a willingness and ability to work cooperatively in small discussion groups and to develop role-play to illustrate learning in areas such as supervisory skills, peer assisted learning, and provision of feedback. There is a comfort with the process.

Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

Yes, to extend it and increase its flexible use in student groups with different life experiences, for example Graduate Entry Masters Students.

To develop different scenarios that are responsive to social change and issues in physiotherapy practice - provided they have a basis in communication, attitudes in care or patient rights.

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
Robyn Cupit
Contact Faculty/School: 
Division of Physiotherapy, School Health and Rehabilitation Sciences
Contact Institution: 
The University of Queensland

Third year student conference organised by 4th year students taking a professional education elective

Developed by: 
Ms Elizabeth Williams and Dr Gillian Webb
Institution: 
The University of Melbourne
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

This conference takes place as the assessment for part of the subject Physiotherapy Practice 1. The student conference introduces the students to an aspect of professional life that they will participate in as graduates. It demonstrates to them the nature of a professional conference. The students are both the participants and the presenters. The students gain information on many aspects of professional issues and related topics from their peers. Time is allowed for questioning and discussion. Keynote speakers are invited to speak on topics of interest to the students and a trade fair is arranged. The conference is organized for the students by fourth year students undertaking a teaching elective. The fourth year students are responsible for the gaining of sponsorship, the trade display, the organisation of the timetable and the production of the conference proceedings. Third year students must individually submit an electronic abstract, which is then compiled into the proceedings. The students are divided into small groups for the presentations and the poster production. Students must reference their talks and posters appropriately.
Prizes are given to the best podium presentation and the best poster. Detailed feedback is given to each group following the conference.
 

Course Name: 
Student Conference in Subject 513-304: Professional practice 1
Year Level: 
First Year
Expected Outcomes: 

Final Year : (Third year students are participants and fourth year students, undertaking a teaching elective, are responsible for the organization.)
 
The students should gain experience in presenting either orally or in the form of a poster at a professional conference
 
Students should gain experience in writing and submitting an abstract.
Students should gain an understanding of a variety of selected professional issues
 
Students should gain an understanding of the roles and responsibilities of the physiotherapist as a health care provider and the practice of physiotherapy within the health care system
 

Effective Aspects: 

This is a student centred learning activity in which the students are responsible for the presentation of key information on professional issues. The students are assigned a mentor to assist them in their work. The students are able to present their material in a number of different formats eg power point presentation, video clips, role plays and posters. The students are encouraged to participate in short discussions responding to questions after each presentation.
The fourth year students get experience in the organizational aspects of a conference and the running of the conference on the two days. Organisation involves designing the cover for the abstracts, sourcing sponsors, setting up the rooms and general help on the days of the conference.

Evaluation: 

This has been evaluated using the standard university quality of teaching survey and also with an internal survey at the end of the conference
 

Evaluation Outcomes: 

The students' feedback has been very positive. They feel that they have gained from having to present in a designated time in the podium presentations and on topics of interest to them. The poster presentation has been very well received as these are left on the notice boards for several months and are read by other students and visitors to the school. Some students have used role plays as their presentation and these have been very popular with the audience. The trade display has also been appreciated by the students, as well as the fact that they are provided with morning tea and lunch.

Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

There is constant review of the topics and how these are spread across the two half days.
 
Changes to expectations around the presentations of the posters has been made in response to costs to students.

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
Gillian Webb
Contact Faculty/School: 
School of Physiotherapy
Contact Institution: 
The University of Melbourne

Indigenous issues for health practitioners

Developed by: 
n/a
Institution: 
Griffith University
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

n/a

Course Name: 
n/a
Year Level: 
First Year
Expected Outcomes: 

n/a

Effective Aspects: 

n/a

Evaluation: 

n/a

Evaluation Outcomes: 

n/a

Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

n/a

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
n/a
Contact Institution: 
Griffith University

Integration of legal and ethical issues into complex case scenarios

Developed by: 
Liisa Laakso and Norm Morris
Institution: 
Griffith University
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

Clinical Conference is a 10CP capstone course undertaken by students in the last/final semester of studies prior to the final 8 weeks of clinical placements. The course aims to fully integrate the student's prior learning in exercise science with evidence-based physiotherapy knowledge and skills using complex clinical cases. These cases are complicated by 'real-life' moral, ethical and medico-legal issues. The students study four separate cases in detail and in a holistic manner, examining the progress of patients through a continuum of care (eg, early diagnosis, acute care, sub-acute needs, rehabilitation and through to re-integration back in to the community). Sessions are led by various members of different disciplines from the healthcare team that might be involved with such cases. The cases are updated and modified each year depending on medical advances or social change.

Course Name: 
5005PES - Clinical Conference
Year Level: 
First Year
Expected Outcomes: 

Year Level : (Year 5 - final year)
 
At the end of the course the student should be able to:

  • present, discuss and justify management strategies for a variety of complex clinical case presentations with the emphasis on evidence based practice;
  • justify diagnostic decisions and management strategies on the basis of clinical assessment findings, and clinical, including propositional and non-propositional knowledge and scientific knowledge;
  • demonstrate an ability to evaluate research literature and apply results to pertinent clinical situations;
  • discuss advanced diagnostic and therapeutic concepts in physiotherapy practice;
  • identify medico-legal and ethical issues arising from clinical situations discussed.
  • Aspects of the teaching and learning practice which make it particularly effective.
  • Use of complex 'real-life' cases that incorporate specific medico-legal and ethical issues that may not have arisen in course work or clinical placements previously.
  • Use of clinical experts to lead 'in-class' discussions.
  • Incorporation of assessment items designed to lead students to identify case-specific issues and to bring together the students' entire prior learning in physiotherapy AND exercise science.

 

Effective Aspects: 

n/a

Evaluation: 

Course evaluations and individual teaching evaluations. Feedback from speakers.

Evaluation Outcomes: 

The course has been offered twice (in 2003 and 2004). The following refers to the most recent offering in 2004. Further feedback from 2003 is available on request.
2004 - Teaching evaluation
In 2004, the following questions were posed to students in evaluating each speaker in 5005PES - Clinical Conference:

  • Relevant topic content to the case study
  • Applicable content for future clinical needs
  • Good speaker would like to hear more from them in future
  • Scale: 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Undecided, 4 = Agree, 5 = Strongly Agree
  • Overall Mean for all speakers (out of total of 5) = 4.2
  • 2004 - Course Evaluation:
  • Excellent feedback has been obtained in both offerings of the course thus far, eg, in 2004:
    • "I thoroughly enjoyed this course, the chance to integrate both degrees is great and I think more of this should be done. A good mix of cases was used."
    • "Great structure to the subject; good idea with the cases and continuing process of management."
    • "Very good administration, course structured well; Good to have experts from different fields talk."
  • Sample of specific questions and responses from course evaluation (Likert scale as above, 1-5):
  • The various aspects of this course worked well together to help me to learn: Mean - 4.1
  • The level of the course was appropriate to my background. Mean - 4.2
  • This course was relevant to my vocational/professional needs. Mean - 4.2
  • The course content helped me to develop skills relevant to my professional needs. Mean 4.2
  • The overall workload in this course was reasonable. Mean - 4.1
  • In this course the convenor encouraged students to reflect about what they had learnt. Mean - 4.2
  • In this course I felt that the teachers respected me as an individual and as a learner. Mean - 4.2
  • This course helped me to further develop problem-solving skills. Mean - 4.1
  • The content of this course was clearly related to the objectives stated in the course outline. Mean - 4.0
Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

Based on 2004 student and speaker feedback for Clinical Conference, a new case will be developed in 2005 to address an identified gap in knowledge.
Based on reflections by the Course Convenor, and student feedback, the final medico-legal written assignment will be replaced by an in-class debate with specific topics related to medico-legal and ethical issues.

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
Norm Morris
Contact Faculty/School: 
School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science
Contact Institution: 
Griffith University

Foundation Skills subject using case studies in multidisciplinary learning groups

Developed by: 
Julia Coyle (Physiotherapy), Rebecca Allen (Occupational Therapy), Paul Tinley (Podiatry), Ruth Beecham (Speech Pathology), Louise Berg (Educational Designer)
Institution: 
Charles Sturt University
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

A new subject, HLT101 Foundation Skills for Allied Health Professionals was offered for the first time in Autumn 2004 to the first year students in physiotherapy, occupational therapy, podiatry and speech pathology. This subject was designed, presented and assessed by an interdisciplinary team of academics.
The School of Community Health is in an optimal position in that four allied health courses (occupational therapy, physiotherapy, podiatry and speech pathology) are offered at the same time on one campus. When students from these courses graduate they need to be able to work effectively in a range of mixed discipline health care teams.
Essentially graduates from these four disciplines need to be able to learn to work together so that on graduation their different contributions will complement the care of their clients (Leathard 1994). CSU has captured an ideal opportunity to enable these four health disciplines to learn together in the same learning environment, and to evaluate the effects of this learning model.
HLT101 includes content that all allied health disciplines require as a foundation. In the past the subject content was taught to each discipline in isolation. HLT101 not only draws students together, but is constructed so that students work cooperatively and collaboratively in interdisciplinary learning groups. Students learn about the process of reflection and how this will enhance their learning. As well, involvement in the project has encouraged lecturers to reflect on their own scholarship in teaching and the learning experiences of their students.
 
Studies have found that if team conflict and failure are to be reduced, allied health professionals need greater understanding of individual roles, skills and expectations, in order to avoid stereotyping that may at times be negative (Hilton 1995; Pietroni 1991). As well, this understanding needs to be developed early in their education if it is to prove effective (Clark 1997). Prior to 2004 students from these courses were enrolled in the same subjects to learn anatomy, physiology and psychology. However, informal observation revealed that students tended to sit in their discipline groups within the lecture theatre. In HLT101 first year students specifically learnt about teams and teamwork, professional roles, and communication skills, all of which have been reported to be vital to the ability of a health professional to work effectively in teams (Pietroni 1991; Clark 1997; Hilton 1995). Interdisciplinary group work formed the foundation of this subject.

Course Name: 
Bachelor of Physiotherapy / HLT101 Foundation skills for Allied Health Professionals
Year Level: 
First Year
Expected Outcomes: 

At the end of this subject, students will be able to:

  • Describe a basic understanding of their profession, and its role within health care teams;
  • Demonstrate an understanding of effective team dynamics;
  • Demonstrate attitudes and skills that enhance and promote membership of a professional community;
  • Describe at a basic level the framework of the Australian health care system, and in particular its impact on rural and regional practice;
  • Describe at a basic level an understanding of the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification system;
  • Discuss cultural, and societal influences on client care;
  • Describe the concept of clinical reasoning, and basic understanding of critical, analytical, and evaluative skills;
  • Understand the concept of being "an agent of change";
  • Identify and develop familiarity with effective communication skills in a variety of contexts;
  • Demonstrate sound academic writing and referencing skills;
  • Detail the principles of nomenclature and terminology used in the Australian Health Care system.
  • Describe at a basic level an understanding of the different models of learning, and appreciate the implications of this on their personal and professional development;
  • Appreciate and demonstrate those characteristics which enhance autonomous and life long learning;
  • Appropriately use, at a beginning level, library databases and understand the differences between them;
  • Appropriately use, at a beginning level, IT resources available through CSU
Effective Aspects: 

In the first lecture students were randomly assigned to groups of 6-8 that contained no more than 2 of any one discipline. The three assessment tasks called upon students to work collaboratively within their groups in order to succeed. For example, a first workshop task required students to get 4 groups together to play a game, (such as trivial pursuit), where each team had to play as if they were a single individual player. The key to this task lay in communication skills. The groups needed to work hard on communication in order to get all 4 teams at the same venue, at the same time, with a game; playing the game turned out to be the easy part. Through experiential learning, students found out about the key factors in effective team communication. This was reflected in the diaries of the task that were submitted as part of their first assignment. An interactive lecture that followed this task helped students to consolidate their understanding of this important area.
Students witnessed the collaborative process amongst the teaching staff. Particular weight was placed on illustrating the issues relating to professionalism and team work.

Evaluation: 

Outcomes on several levels have been evaluated including
 

  • The students' perception of team dynamics and team roles in the allied health context
  • The lecturers' perception of team dynamics and team roles in the allied health context
  • Student feedback on the teaching of the subject
  • The lecturers' perception of being involved in an interdisciplinary teaching model

Evaluation involved a multifaceted approach and included:
 

  • Diary of the development process;
  • Questionnaires for student and lecturer participants;
  • Ongoing "Post-it" evaluations
  • CELT Student Subject Survey
  • Semi structured interviews
Evaluation Outcomes: 

Extensive evaluation is underway. Early findings indicate that students found the interdisciplinary group work both challenging and rewarding. Feedback from co-requisite subjects shows that these students have a more realistic perspective on the role of their profession and others, and a sound understanding of teamwork.

Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

As we are still in the evaluation phase, it is difficult to detail the changes. Some remodeling of the topics is likely, however, the key foundation that requires students to work effectively in teams in order to succeed will remain.

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
Julia Coyle
Contact Faculty/School: 
School of Community Health
Contact Institution: 
Charles Sturt University

Medico-legal, ethical requirements, and quality and safety in health through multi-disciplinary seminars

Developed by: 
Ms Deborah Carrera
Institution: 
University of Canberra
Teaching and Learning Strategy: 

This subject covers three aspects of working as a health professional again in a multidisciplinary team. These incude medico-legal and ethical requirements, working within a multidisciplinary team, and quality and safety in health care.
Ethical practice is taught separately and integrates within other topics.
 
Medico-legal issues include:

  • Law and health care
  • Requirements
  • Professional code of conduct
  • Insurance issues
     

The multidisciplinary team introduces the student to:

  • A range of allied health and medical disciplines. Their role in the health system will be explored in seminar format. Interaction between the health professionals will be encouraged to maximise client outcomes.
  • Community resources and access to these
  • Quality and Safety of Health Care is considered in private practice, accreditation processes, and physiotherapists role in prescribing medications. The Quality and Safety of Health Care unit will be integrated into a category of the ACT Health Quality and Safety Best Practise Awards within which a "student category" is to be developed.
Course Name: 
Health Professional Practice 2
Year Level: 
Second Year
Expected Outcomes: 

On completion of this subject, students will have an understanding of the ethical and legal issues, and be able to demonstrate application of this knowledge. An appreciation of the multi disciplinary nature of health care and an ability to liaise with other providers will be shown by the student to provide long-term management strategies for the patient. Application of the requirements of quality and safety in health care will be required of the student.

Effective Aspects: 

Immediate integration of the students as members of a "health care team" working together to achieve specific outcomes both for the client and for their own self management as a health care professional.

Evaluation: 

This is a new subject, yet to be evaluated

Evaluation Outcomes: 

n/a

Plans for Changes/Developments in Future: 

n/a

For Further Details
Contact Name: 
Deborah Carrera
Contact Institution: 
University of Canberra